[PATCH 1/3] ima: keep the integrity state of open files up to date
Janne Karhunen
janne.karhunen at gmail.com
Mon Sep 16 11:45:56 UTC 2019
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:24 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > This still doesn't make it crash-safe. So why is it okay?
> >
> > If Android is the load, this makes it crash safe 99% of the time and
> > that is considerably better than 0% of the time.
> >
>
> Who will use it if it isn't 100% safe?
I suppose anyone using mutable data with IMA appraise should, unless
they have a redundant power supply and a kernel that never crashes. In
a way this is like asking if the ima-appraise should be there for
mutable data at all. All this is doing is that it improves the crash
recovery reliability without taking anything away.
Anyway, I think I'm getting along with my understanding of the page
writeback slowly and the journal support will eventually be there at
least as an add-on patch for those that want to use it and really need
the last 0.n% reliability. Note that even without that patch you can
build ima-appraise based systems that are 99.999% reliable just by
having the patch we're discussing here. Without it you would be orders
of magnitude worse off. All we are doing is that we give it a fairly
good chance to recover instead of giving up without even trying.
That said, I'm not sure the 100% crash recovery is ever guaranteed in
any Linux system. We just have to do what we can, no?
--
Janne
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list