[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v1] apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack
Iurii Zaikin
yzaikin at google.com
Fri Oct 18 00:33:56 UTC 2019
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:19 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins at google.com> wrote:
> +config SECURITY_APPARMOR_TEST
> + bool "Build KUnit tests for policy_unpack.c"
> + default n
> + depends on KUNIT && SECURITY_APPARMOR
> + help
>
select SECURITY_APPARMOR ?
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
> + memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE) == 0);
I think this must be KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, size, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);,
otherwise there could be a buffer overflow in memcmp. All tests that
follow such pattern
are suspect. Also, not sure about your stylistic preference for
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE) == 0);
vs
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
0,
memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE));
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list