[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v1] apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit	tests for policy unpack
    Iurii Zaikin 
    yzaikin at google.com
       
    Fri Oct 18 00:33:56 UTC 2019
    
    
  
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:19 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins at google.com> wrote:
> +config SECURITY_APPARMOR_TEST
> +       bool "Build KUnit tests for policy_unpack.c"
> +       default n
> +       depends on KUNIT && SECURITY_APPARMOR
> +       help
>
select SECURITY_APPARMOR ?
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, size, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
> +               memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE) == 0);
I think this must be  KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, size, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE);,
otherwise there could be a buffer overflow in memcmp. All tests that
follow such pattern
are suspect. Also, not sure about your stylistic preference for
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test,
               memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE) == 0);
vs
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
               0,
               memcmp(blob, TEST_BLOB_DATA, TEST_BLOB_DATA_SIZE));
    
    
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list