[PATCH v4] apparmor: Use a memory pool instead per-CPU caches

John Johansen john.johansen at canonical.com
Wed Oct 2 15:47:58 UTC 2019

On 10/2/19 1:59 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-05-07 12:57:04 [-0700], John Johansen wrote:
>> I am going to pull this into my tree and let it sit in linux-next
>> for a cycle so we can get better testing on this before it is pushed
>> out
> We talked about this during the merge window for 5.2-rc1. These changes
> were not part of 5.4-rc1. Was there a fallout, anything I can help with?
I have some patches that are required on top of them. I didn't chase down
all the issues/get the patches done until after -rc6 so everything waits
for the next cycle. I am going to update apparmor-next with the new stack
this week.

More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list