[PATCH] x86/mtrr: Require CAP_SYS_ADMIN for all access
Borislav Petkov
bp at alien8.de
Tue Nov 19 10:07:53 UTC 2019
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Zhang Xiaoxu noted that physical address locations for MTRR were
> visible to non-root users, which could be considered an information
> leak. In discussing[1] the options for solving this, it sounded like
> just moving the capable check into open() was the first step. If this
> breaks userspace, then we will have a test case for the more conservative
> approaches discussed in the thread. In summary:
>
> - MTRR should check capabilities at open time (or retain the
> checks on the opener's permissions for later checks).
>
> - changing the DAC permissions might break something that expects to
> open mtrr when not uid 0.
>
> - if we leave the DAC permissions alone and just move the capable check
> to the opener, we should get the desired protection. (i.e. check
> against CAP_SYS_ADMIN not just the wider uid 0.)
>
> - if that still breaks things, as in userspace expects to be able to
> read other parts of the file as non-uid-0 and non-CAP_SYS_ADMIN, then
> we need to censor the contents using the opener's permissions. For
> example, as done in other /proc cases, like commit 51d7b120418e
> ("/proc/iomem: only expose physical resource addresses to privileged
> users").
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/201911110934.AC5BA313@keescook/
>
> Reported-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5 at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/if.c | 21 ++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Yap, LGTM, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
However, as it has a user-visible impact and it is not an urgent thing
to have in the tree, I'd not queue this now but after the merge window
is done so that we have a maximum time of exposure in linux-next and we
can have ample time to addres fallout.
/me puts it on the list for after the merge window.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list