[PATCH v7 4/5] IMA: Add support to limit measuring keys
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Thu Nov 14 14:37:17 UTC 2019
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 19:12 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> +/**
> + * ima_match_keyring - determine whether the keyring matches the measure rule
> + * @rule: a pointer to a rule
> + * @keyring: name of the keyring to match against the measure rule
> + *
> + * If the measure action for KEY_CHECK does not specify keyrings=
> + * option then return true (Measure all keys).
> + * Else, return true if the given keyring name is present in
> + * the keyrings= option. False, otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
> + const char *keyring)
> +{
> + if ((keyring == NULL) || (rule->keyrings == NULL)
> + return true;
If the policy requires matching a specific keyring, then the "keyring"
needs to match. The logic, here, isn't quite right.
> + else
> + return (strstr(rule->keyrings, keyring) != NULL);
if (rule->keyrings) {
if (!keyring)
return false;
return (strstr(rule->keyrings, keyring) != NULL);
}
return true;
Keyrings may be created by userspace with any name (e.g. foo, foobar,
...). A keyring name might be a subset of another keyring name. For
example, with the policy "keyrings=foobar", keys being loaded on "foo"
would also be measured. Using strstr() will not achieve what is
needed.
Mimi
> +}
> +
> /**
> * ima_match_rules - determine whether an inode matches the measure rule.
> * @rule: a pointer to a rule
> @@ -364,18 +384,23 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated
> * @func: LIM hook identifier
> * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC)
> + * @keyring: keyring name to check in policy for KEY_CHECK func
> *
> * Returns true on rule match, false on failure.
> */
> static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
> - enum ima_hooks func, int mask)
> + enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
> + const char *keyring)
> {
> int i;
>
> if ((func == KEXEC_CMDLINE) || (func == KEY_CHECK)) {
> - if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func == func))
> + if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func == func)) {
> + if (func == KEY_CHECK)
> + return ima_match_keyring(rule, keyring);
> return true;
> + }
> return false;
> }
> if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) &&
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list