[PATCH v10 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor
Casey Schaufler
casey at schaufler-ca.com
Wed Nov 6 16:11:20 UTC 2019
On 11/6/2019 2:40 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>> Can you re-base on something more recent than v5.1-rc2 (that's the base for that branch currently)?
>>> At present it won't even boot for me on modern Fedora. Two key missing commits are:
>> Sigh. It's based on James' next-general. As it's going up through James,
>> and he hasn't updated that branch, I'm sort of stuck. BTW, I have a re-based
>> version, but don't see how to get it into my git tree without mucking up
>> the eventual merge.
> Don't use next-general for this. Use the most recent released kernel if
> that works.
On 9/24/2019 10:56 AM, James Morris wrote:
> I'd probably create a new branch (next-stacking) from v5.4 for this work.
I'm planning to switch over once next-stacking gets created. I've stuck
with next-general because my understanding has been to not rebase unless
necessary, and to not get ahead of what where you're expected to land.
I'll rebase now, but fear I may end up with git tree issues moving from
security#next-general.
I am counting on getting next-stacking shortly after 5.4. Let me know
if that plan changes.
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list