[GIT PULL] security subsystem: Tomoyo updates for v5.2
jmorris at namei.org
Mon May 13 18:03:42 UTC 2019
On Sun, 12 May 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > My guess is that you are right and
> > any *significant* changes to the LSM layer itself, e.g. security/*, is
> > best sent via James' tree. For smaller changes to the LSM layer I
> > think it's okay if they go in via an individual LSM tree so long as
> > all the other LSMs agree-on/ack the changes; which pretty much fits
> > what we've been doing for some time now and it seems to work well
> > enough.
> Yeah, I think that's the sane model. And I think it's mostly been working.
New LSMs also need to be guided in, as part of a community effort.
<jmorris at namei.org>
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive