[PATCH v10 00/17] Remove nested TPM operations
Winkler, Tomas
tomas.winkler at intel.com
Tue Jan 29 14:16:56 UTC 2019
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:59:48PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/23/19 1:20 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:23:25PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >> Make the changes necessary to detach TPM space code and TPM
> > > >> activation code out of the tpm_transmit() flow because of both of
> > > >> these can cause nested tpm_transmit() calls. The nesteds calls
> > > >> make the whole flow hard to maintain, and thus, it is better to
> > > >> just fix things now before this turns into a bigger mess.
> > > > Any reasons not to merge this soon?
> > >
> > > I suppose v10 hasn't changed anything signinficat. So, not from my
> perspective.
> > > Were you waiting for more Reviewed-by's?
> > >
> > I'm okay, in theory I've cleaned all my concern regarding idle and
> > locality . I'm just want do few more tests on Sunday.
>
> I'm in no rush merging this piece of code, as long as it gets merged at some
> point. Thomas, can you take a look at the PTT issue we are having.
>
> See my discussion with Linus with subject "Getting weird TPM error after
> rebasing my tree to security/next-general". You have better knowledge of the
> internals so I would really like to hear your feedback on that.
> We need to get a fix for that for v5.0.
Yes, looking into in new ICL, had some issues to bring the platform on. It's really failing (selftest) , we are looking into it.
Will also testing the nesting removal patches.
Thanks
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list