[PATCH v2 13/20] Add set_alias_ function and x86 implementation

[Edgecombe, Rick P]

On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 14:59 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09 AM Borislav Petkov <bp at alien8.de> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 04:34:15PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > > This adds two new functions set_alias_default_noflush and
> > 
> > s/This adds/Add/
> > 
> > > set_alias_nv_noflush for setting the alias mapping for the page to its
> > 
> > Please end function names with parentheses, below too.
> > 
> > > default valid permissions and to an invalid state that cannot be cached in
> > > a TLB, respectively. These functions to not flush the TLB.
> > 
> > s/to/do/
> > 
> > Also, pls put that description as comments over the functions in the
> > code. Otherwise that "nv" as part of the name doesn't really explain
> > what it does.
> > 
> > Actually, you could just as well call the function
> > 
> > set_alias_invalid_noflush()
> > 
> > All the other words are written in full, no need to have "nv" there.
> 
> Why are you calling this an "alias"?  You're modifying the direct map.
> Your patches are thinking of the direct map as an alias of the vmap
> mapping, but that does seem a bit backwards.  How about
> set_direct_map_invalid_noflush(), etc?
> 
I picked it up from some of the names in arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:
CPA_NO_CHECK_ALIAS, set_memory_np_noalias(), etc. In that file the directmap
address seems to be the "alias". For 32 bit with highmem though, this would also
set permissions for a kmap mapping as well (if one existed), since that address
will be returned from page_address().

Yea, in vmalloc, vm_unmap_aliases talks about the vmap address "alias". So I
guess calling it "alias" is ambiguous. But does set_direct_map_invalid_noflush
make sense in the highmem case?

I couldn't think of any names that I loved, which is why I ran the
set_alias_*_noflush names by people in an earlier version, although looking back
only Ard chimed in on that. "set_direct_map_invalid_noflush" is fine with me if
nobody objects.

Thanks,

Rick