[PATCH] LSM: Allow syzbot to ignore security= parameter.
keescook at chromium.org
Fri Feb 8 21:33:13 UTC 2019
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:24 AM Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> I added Kees to the CC list. Kees, what to you think about
> ignoring security= if lsm= is specified? I'm ambivalent.
This was one of many earlier suggestions, and the consensus seemed to
be "don't mix security= and lsm=". Why would anyone use both?
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive