[PATCH v11 00/16] Remove nested TPM operations
Stefan Berger
stefanb at linux.ibm.com
Fri Feb 8 12:22:48 UTC 2019
On 2/8/19 6:50 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:14:54PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>> chip->ops = NULL;
>> up_write(&chip->ops_sem);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> index 02e8cffd1163..fcd845ad8c3c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
>> @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ static ssize_t tpm_try_transmit(struct tpm_chip *chip,
>> void *buf, size_t bufsiz)
>> dev_err(&chip->dev, "tpm_transmit: tpm_recv: error %d\n", rc);
>> } else if (len < TPM_HEADER_SIZE || len != be32_to_cpu(header->length))
>> rc = -EFAULT;
>> + else
>> + rc = 0;
> Why is this needed?
Because it holds a non-zero value, which is wrong at this point. Below
it is:
return rc ? rc : len;
It will always return that rc and never 'len'.
It's not just needed for bisecting. I still need it with your latest
tree. That's the only change I need with my current testing of
tpm_vtpm_proxy, TIS + TPM 1.2 , TIS + TPM 2.0 , and CRB + TPM 2.0 (with
QEMU :-) ).
Stefan
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list