Looks like issue in handling active_nodes count in 4.19 kernel .

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:51 AM Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
>
> On 12/17/19 10:40 AM, Ravi Kumar Siddojigari wrote:
> > Yes  indeed this is a stress test on ARM64 device with multicore  where most of the cores /tasks are stuck  in avc_reclaim_node .
> > We still see this issue even after picking the earlier patch " selinux: ensure we cleanup the internal AVC counters on error in avc_insert() commit: d8db60cb23e4"
> > Where selinux_state  during issue was as below where all the slots are  NULL and the count was more than threshold.
> > Which seem to be calling avc_reclaim_node always and as the all the slots are empty its going for full for- loop with locks and unlock and taking too long .
> > Not sure what could make the  slots null , for sure its not due to flush() /Reset(). We think that still we need to call  avc_kill_node  in update_node function .
> > Adding the patch below can you please review or correct the following patch .
> >
> >
> >    selinux_state = (
> >      disabled = FALSE,
> >      enforcing = TRUE,
> >      checkreqprot = FALSE,
> >      initialized = TRUE,
> >      policycap = (TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, TRUE),
> >      avc = 0xFFFFFF9BEFF1E890 -> (
> >        avc_cache_threshold = 512,  /* <<<<<not configured and its with default*/
> >        avc_cache = (
> >          slots = ((first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first = 0x0), (first   /*<<<< all are NULL */
> >          slots_lock = ((rlock = (raw_lock = (val = (counter = 0), locked = 0, pending = 0, locked_pending = 0, tail = 0), magic = 3735899821, owner_cpu = 4294967295, owner = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, dep_map = (key = 0xFFFFFF9BEFF298A8, cla
> >          lru_hint = (counter = 616831529),
> >          active_nodes = (counter = 547),   /*<<<<< increased more than 512*/
> >          latest_notif = 1)),
> >      ss = 0xFFFFFF9BEFF2E578)
> >
> >
> > --
> > In AVC update we don't call avc_node_kill() when avc_xperms_populate()
> > fails, resulting in the avc->avc_cache.active_nodes counter having a
> > false value.In last patch this changes was missed , so correcting it.
> >
> > Change-Id: Ic0298162cc766c0f21be7ab232e259766654dad3
> > Signed-off-by: Jaihind Yadav<jaihindyadav at codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> >   security/selinux/avc.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/avc.c b/security/selinux/avc.c
> > index 91d24c2..3d1cff2 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/avc.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/avc.c
> > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int avc_update_node(struct selinux_avc *avc,
> >          if (orig->ae.xp_node) {
> >                  rc = avc_xperms_populate(node, orig->ae.xp_node);
> >                  if (rc) {
> > -                       kmem_cache_free(avc_node_cachep, node);
> > +                       avc_node_kill(avc, node);
> >                          goto out_unlock;
> >                  }
> >          }
> > --
>
> That looks correct to me; I guess that one got missed by the prior fix.
> Still not sure how your AVC got into that state though...
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov>

This looks good to me too.  Ravi, can you submit this as a proper
patch with From: set to Jaihing Yadav (assuming they are the author)
and your sign-off?

Thanks.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com