[PATCH v12 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob
Stephen Smalley
sds at tycho.nsa.gov
Wed Dec 18 17:41:20 UTC 2019
On 12/16/19 5:36 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Netlabel uses LSM interfaces requiring an lsmblob and
> the internal storage is used to pass information between
> these interfaces, so change the internal data from a secid
> to a lsmblob. Update the netlabel interfaces and their
> callers to accommodate the change. This requires that the
> modules using netlabel use the lsm_id.slot to access the
> correct secid when using netlabel.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> include/net/netlabel.h | 8 ++--
> net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 6 ++-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 6 +--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 57 +++++++++++------------------
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.h | 2 +-
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/include/security.h | 1 +
> security/selinux/netlabel.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/ss/services.c | 4 +-
> security/smack/smack.h | 1 +
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 5 ++-
> security/smack/smackfs.c | 10 +++--
> 12 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> index 376882215919..8ee7a804423e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> @@ -1467,7 +1467,8 @@ static int cipso_v4_gentag_loc(const struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def,
>
> buffer[0] = CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOCAL;
> buffer[1] = CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOC_BLEN;
> - *(u32 *)&buffer[2] = secattr->attr.secid;
> + /* only one netlabel user - the first */
> + *(u32 *)&buffer[2] = secattr->attr.lsmblob.secid[0];
>
> return CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOC_BLEN;
> }
> @@ -1487,7 +1488,8 @@ static int cipso_v4_parsetag_loc(const struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def,
> const unsigned char *tag,
> struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *secattr)
> {
> - secattr->attr.secid = *(u32 *)&tag[2];
> + /* only one netlabel user - the first */
> + secattr->attr.lsmblob.secid[0] = *(u32 *)&tag[2];
> secattr->flags |= NETLBL_SECATTR_SECID;
>
> return 0;
Here we always use secid[0].
> diff --git a/security/selinux/netlabel.c b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
> index 6a94b31b5472..d8d7603ab14e 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/netlabel.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *selinux_netlbl_sock_getattr(
> return NULL;
>
> if ((secattr->flags & NETLBL_SECATTR_SECID) &&
> - (secattr->attr.secid == sid))
> + (secattr->attr.lsmblob.secid[selinux_lsmid.slot] == sid))
> return secattr;
>
> return NULL;
And here we use secid[selinux_lsmid.slot]. So things will break in
interesting ways if selinux_lsmid.slot is anything other than zero?
What's the point of using this indirection in the security modules
until/unless NetLabel truly supports something other than slot 0?
> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> index a5813c7629c1..2b7680903b6b 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> @@ -3599,7 +3599,7 @@ int security_netlbl_secattr_to_sid(struct selinux_state *state,
> if (secattr->flags & NETLBL_SECATTR_CACHE)
> *sid = *(u32 *)secattr->cache->data;
> else if (secattr->flags & NETLBL_SECATTR_SECID)
> - *sid = secattr->attr.secid;
> + *sid = secattr->attr.lsmblob.secid[selinux_lsmid.slot];
> else if (secattr->flags & NETLBL_SECATTR_MLS_LVL) {
> rc = -EIDRM;
> ctx = sidtab_search(sidtab, SECINITSID_NETMSG);
> @@ -3672,7 +3672,7 @@ int security_netlbl_sid_to_secattr(struct selinux_state *state,
> if (secattr->domain == NULL)
> goto out;
>
> - secattr->attr.secid = sid;
> + secattr->attr.lsmblob.secid[selinux_lsmid.slot] = sid;
> secattr->flags |= NETLBL_SECATTR_DOMAIN_CPY | NETLBL_SECATTR_SECID;
> mls_export_netlbl_lvl(policydb, ctx, secattr);
> rc = mls_export_netlbl_cat(policydb, ctx, secattr);
Ditto
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list