[PATCH v12 03/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Stephen Smalley
sds at tycho.nsa.gov
Tue Dec 17 17:34:59 UTC 2019
On 12/16/19 5:35 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
> to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
> lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
>
> Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
> lsmblob instead of a u32. In some cases this requires a
> temporary conversion using lsmblob_init() that will go
> away when other interfaces get converted.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 7 +++++--
> kernel/auditsc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 4 ++--
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 7 +++++--
> security/security.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index b74dc70088ca..9c6dbe248eaf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -1837,7 +1837,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
> int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
> -int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule);
> +int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
> + void *lsmrule);
> void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule);
>
> #else
> @@ -1853,8 +1854,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
> - void *lsmrule)
> +static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
> + u32 op, void *lsmrule)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index b0126e9c0743..356db1dd276c 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
> struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
> pid_t pid;
> u32 sid;
> + struct lsmblob blob;
>
> switch (f->type) {
> case AUDIT_PID:
> @@ -1355,8 +1356,10 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
> case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
> if (f->lsm_rule) {
> security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
> - result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
> - f->type, f->op, f->lsm_rule);
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
> + result = security_audit_rule_match(
> + &blob, f->type,
> + f->op, f->lsm_rule);
> }
> break;
> case AUDIT_EXE:
> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> index 4effe01ebbe2..7566e5b1c419 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
> const struct cred *cred;
> int i, need_sid = 1;
> u32 sid;
> + struct lsmblob blob;
> unsigned int sessionid;
>
> cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
> @@ -643,7 +644,9 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
> security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
> need_sid = 0;
> }
> - result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
> + result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
> + f->type,
> f->op,
> f->lsm_rule);
> }
> @@ -658,15 +661,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
> if (f->lsm_rule) {
> /* Find files that match */
> if (name) {
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
> result = security_audit_rule_match(
> - name->osid,
> + &blob,
> f->type,
> f->op,
> f->lsm_rule);
> } else if (ctx) {
> list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, n->osid);
> if (security_audit_rule_match(
> - n->osid,
> + &blob,
> f->type,
> f->op,
> f->lsm_rule)) {
> @@ -678,7 +683,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
> /* Find ipc objects that match */
> if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
> break;
> - if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
> + if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
> f->type, f->op,
> f->lsm_rule))
> ++result;
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index df4ca482fb53..d95b0ece7434 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
> - void *lsmrule)
> +static inline int security_filter_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
> + u32 op, void *lsmrule)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index f19a895ad7cd..193ddd55420b 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
> int rc = 0;
> u32 osid;
> + struct lsmblob blob;
>
> if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
> continue;
> @@ -423,7 +424,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
> case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
> security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
> - rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, osid);
> + rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
> rule->lsm[i].type,
> Audit_equal,
> rule->lsm[i].rule);
> @@ -431,7 +433,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
> case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
> case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
> - rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
> + lsmblob_init(&blob, secid);
> + rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
> rule->lsm[i].type,
> Audit_equal,
> rule->lsm[i].rule);
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index a89634af639a..bfea9739c084 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
> /*
> * Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
> */
> -static int lsm_slot __initdata;
> +static int lsm_slot __lsm_ro_after_init;
>
> /**
> * security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
> @@ -2412,9 +2412,21 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
> call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule);
> }
>
> -int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule)
> +int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
> + void *lsmrule)
> {
> - return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule);
> + struct security_hook_list *hp;
> + int rc;
> +
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
> + if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
> + continue;
Do you think we really need to retain these WARN_ON()s? If not, then
you could dispense with it now and leave lsm_slot as __initdata? Otherwise,
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov>
> + rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
> + field, op, lsmrule);
> + if (rc != 0)
> + return rc;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>
>
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list