[PATCH V40 03/29] security: Add a static lockdown policy LSM
David Howells
dhowells at redhat.com
Fri Aug 30 16:28:26 UTC 2019
Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett at google.com> wrote:
> +static char *lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = {
const char *const maybe?
> +static enum lockdown_reason lockdown_levels[] = {LOCKDOWN_NONE,
> + LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX,
> + LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX};
> +
const?
Isn't this also a 1:1 mapping?
> +static int lock_kernel_down(const char *where, enum lockdown_reason level)
Is the last parameter the reason or the level? You're mixing the terms.
David
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list