[PATCH 3/6] Avoid build warning when !CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:24 PM Dave Young <dyoung at redhat.com> wrote:

> I can not get the whole thread, also not sure which tree it should
> apply.

This should be against -next.

> Also I think it should be good to split the preparation piece of kexec
> and send them separately.  Since it is improve the signature
> verification logic, they do not necessarily depend on the lockdown
> series.

Sorry, which preparation piece? There shouldn't be any logic change in
this patch.