[PATCH] tomoyo: common: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability

Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel at i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Thu Aug 1 11:02:46 UTC 2019


Hello.

Thanks for a patch, but I have a question.

On 2019/08/01 3:54, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> profile is controlled by user-space via /sys/kernel/security/tomoyo/profile,

It is true that "profile" value is given from user-space, and it will be true
that speculative execution would access "ns->profile_ptr[profile]" before whether
"profile >= TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES" is true is concluded. But

> hence leading to a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1
> vulnerability.

which memory address is vulnerable to Spectre variant 1 attack? How can an attacker
gain information from memory speculatively accessed by "ns->profile_ptr[profile]" ?
Where is the memory access which corresponds to "arr2->data[index2]" demonstrated at
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html ?

Since I'm not familiar with Spectre/Meltdown problem, this patch sounds as if
"Oh, let's suppress Smatch warning". I want to know whether this problem is real
and this patch is worth keeping stable at vger.kernel.org ...

> @@ -488,13 +489,15 @@ static void tomoyo_print_number_union(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,
>   * Returns pointer to "struct tomoyo_profile" on success, NULL otherwise.
>   */
>  static struct tomoyo_profile *tomoyo_assign_profile
> -(struct tomoyo_policy_namespace *ns, const unsigned int profile)
> +(struct tomoyo_policy_namespace *ns, unsigned int profile)
>  {
>  	struct tomoyo_profile *ptr;
>  	struct tomoyo_profile *entry;
>  
>  	if (profile >= TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES)
>  		return NULL;
> +	profile = array_index_nospec(profile, TOMOYO_MAX_PROFILES);
> +
>  	ptr = ns->profile_ptr[profile];
>  	if (ptr)
>  		return ptr;
> 

By the way, since /sys/kernel/security/tomoyo/profile is writable by only explicitly
whitelisted domains/programs (&& by only root user by default), I think that it is
OK to treat this "profile" value as trusted.



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list