[PATCH security-next v3 28/29] LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM

[Kees Cook]

In order to both support old "security=" Legacy Major LSM selection, and
handling real exclusivity, this creates LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE and updates
the selection logic to handle them.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
---
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h  |  1 +
 security/apparmor/lsm.c    |  2 +-
 security/security.c        | 12 ++++++++++++
 security/selinux/hooks.c   |  2 +-
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c |  2 +-
 security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c   |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index 950042fb2385..0f5d44d0a9cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -2040,6 +2040,7 @@ extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
 				char *lsm);
 
 #define LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR	BIT(0)
+#define LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE	BIT(1)
 
 enum lsm_order {
 	LSM_ORDER_FIRST = -1,	/* This is only for capabilities. */
diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index 5399c2f03536..d68bc931d388 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ static int __init apparmor_init(void)
 }
 
 DEFINE_LSM(apparmor)
-	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
 	.enabled = &apparmor_enabled,
 	.init = apparmor_init,
 END_LSM;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index ade74b90b73c..5a3e19f1fe48 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static __initconst const char * const builtin_lsm_order = CONFIG_LSM_ORDER;
 
 /* Ordered list of LSMs to initialize. */
 static __initdata struct lsm_info **ordered_lsms;
+static __initdata struct lsm_info *exclusive;
 
 static bool debug __initdata;
 #define init_debug(...)						\
@@ -204,6 +205,12 @@ static bool __init lsm_allowed(struct lsm_info *lsm)
 	if (!is_enabled(lsm))
 		return false;
 
+	/* Not allowed if another exclusive LSM already initialized. */
+	if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && exclusive) {
+		init_debug("exclusive disabled: %s\n", lsm->name);
+		return false;
+	}
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -219,6 +226,11 @@ static void __init maybe_initialize_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
 	if (enabled) {
 		int ret;
 
+		if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !exclusive) {
+			exclusive = lsm;
+			init_debug("exclusive: %s\n", lsm->name);
+		}
+
 		init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->name);
 		ret = lsm->init();
 		WARN(ret, "%s failed to initialize: %d\n", lsm->name, ret);
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 409a9252aeb6..5461d54fcd99 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -7193,7 +7193,7 @@ void selinux_complete_init(void)
 /* SELinux requires early initialization in order to label
    all processes and objects when they are created. */
 DEFINE_LSM(selinux)
-	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
 	.enabled = &selinux_enabled,
 	.init = selinux_init,
 END_LSM;
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index e79fad43a8e3..e46c1ea8cf84 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -4880,6 +4880,6 @@ static __init int smack_init(void)
  * all processes and objects when they are created.
  */
 DEFINE_LSM(smack)
-	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
 	.init = smack_init,
 END_LSM;
diff --git a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
index 39bb994ebe09..cc39eb8df61a 100644
--- a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
+++ b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
@@ -549,6 +549,6 @@ static int __init tomoyo_init(void)
 }
 
 DEFINE_LSM(tomoyo)
-	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
 	.init = tomoyo_init,
 END_LSM;
-- 
2.17.1