[PATCH v3 3/6] ima: refactor ima_init_policy()
Nayna Jain
nayna at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Sep 24 11:10:39 UTC 2018
On 09/21/2018 02:04 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Nayna,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nayna-Jain/Add-support-for-architecture-specific-IMA-policies/20180920-035110
>
> smatch warnings:
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:489 add_rules() warn: should this be a bitwise op?
>
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/84a2e186f940ebc6c34e6d276e55f665167a5bb8
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git remote update linux-review
> git checkout 84a2e186f940ebc6c34e6d276e55f665167a5bb8
> vim +489 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
>
> 6f0911a6 Mimi Zohar 2018-04-12 477
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 478 static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 479 enum policy_rule_list file)
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 480 {
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 481 int i = 0;
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 482
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 483 for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 484 struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 485
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 486 if (file && IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 487 list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &ima_default_rules);
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 488
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 @489 if (file && IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY) {
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> It does look like it should be "if (file & IMA_CUSTOM_POLICY) {" but I
> haven't looked at the context besides what's here in this email.
Thanks Dan for noticing this. Yes, I will fix it and post the v4 version.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
>
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 490 entry = kmemdup(&entries[i], sizeof(*entry),
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 491 GFP_KERNEL);
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 492 if (!entry)
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 493 continue;
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 494
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 495 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 496 list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 497 }
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 498 if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 499 temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 500 if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 501 temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 502 }
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 503 }
> 84a2e186 Nayna Jain 2018-09-19 504
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
>
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list