[PATCH security-next v2 25/26] LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM
Kees Cook
keescook at chromium.org
Thu Sep 20 16:23:37 UTC 2018
In order to both support old "security=" Legacy Major LSM selection, and
handling real exclusivity, this creates LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE and updates
the selection logic to handle them.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
---
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 1 +
security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +-
security/security.c | 12 ++++++++++++
security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index 8e843eaacffb..7d9c94d31279 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -2040,6 +2040,7 @@ extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
char *lsm);
#define LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR (1 << 0)
+#define LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE (2 << 0)
enum lsm_order {
LSM_ORDER_FIRST = -1, /* This is only for capabilities. */
diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index 5399c2f03536..d68bc931d388 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ static int __init apparmor_init(void)
}
DEFINE_LSM(apparmor)
- .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+ .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
.enabled = &apparmor_enabled,
.init = apparmor_init,
END_LSM;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index a40e938db1b0..f076fdc6b451 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static __initconst const char * const builtin_lsm_order = CONFIG_LSM_ORDER;
/* Ordered list of LSMs to initialize. */
static __initdata struct lsm_info **ordered_lsms;
+static __initdata struct lsm_info *exclusive;
static bool debug __initdata;
#define init_debug(...) \
@@ -181,6 +182,12 @@ static bool __init lsm_allowed(struct lsm_info *lsm)
if (lsm->enabled && !*lsm->enabled)
return false;
+ /* Not allowed if another exclusive LSM already initialized. */
+ if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && exclusive) {
+ init_debug("exclusive disabled: %s\n", lsm->name);
+ return false;
+ }
+
return true;
}
@@ -196,6 +203,11 @@ static void __init maybe_initialize_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm)
if (enabled) {
int ret;
+ if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !exclusive) {
+ exclusive = lsm;
+ init_debug("exclusive: %s\n", lsm->name);
+ }
+
init_debug("initializing %s\n", lsm->name);
ret = lsm->init();
WARN(ret, "%s failed to initialize: %d\n", lsm->name, ret);
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 409a9252aeb6..5461d54fcd99 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -7193,7 +7193,7 @@ void selinux_complete_init(void)
/* SELinux requires early initialization in order to label
all processes and objects when they are created. */
DEFINE_LSM(selinux)
- .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+ .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
.enabled = &selinux_enabled,
.init = selinux_init,
END_LSM;
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index e79fad43a8e3..e46c1ea8cf84 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -4880,6 +4880,6 @@ static __init int smack_init(void)
* all processes and objects when they are created.
*/
DEFINE_LSM(smack)
- .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+ .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
.init = smack_init,
END_LSM;
diff --git a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
index 39bb994ebe09..cc39eb8df61a 100644
--- a/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
+++ b/security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c
@@ -549,6 +549,6 @@ static int __init tomoyo_init(void)
}
DEFINE_LSM(tomoyo)
- .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
+ .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
.init = tomoyo_init,
END_LSM;
--
2.17.1
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list