[RFC 09/12] mm: Restrict memory encryption to anonymous VMA's

Dave Hansen dave.hansen at intel.com
Mon Sep 10 21:09:26 UTC 2018


On 09/10/2018 02:07 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:57:49AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 09/10/2018 11:21 AM, Sakkinen, Jarkko wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Encrypted mprotect is only supported on anonymous mappings.
>>>> + * All VMA's in the requested range must be anonymous. If this
>>>> + * test fails on any single VMA, the entire mprotect request fails.
>>>> + */
>>> kdoc
>> kdoc what?  You want this comment in kdoc format?  Why?
> If there is a header comment for a function anyway, why wouldn't you
> put it to kdoc-format?

Because this is a shorter and more concise way to document the function.
 kdoc isn't universally the best thing to do for function comments.



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list