[PATCH 1/2] security: Move LSM registration arguments to struct lsm_info
Casey Schaufler
casey at schaufler-ca.com
Tue May 29 23:12:51 UTC 2018
On 5/29/2018 3:54 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2018, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>
>> struct security_hook_list {
>> - struct hlist_node list;
>> - struct hlist_head *head;
>> - union security_list_options hook;
>> - char *lsm;
>> + struct hlist_node list;
>> + struct hlist_head *head;
>> + const union security_list_options hook;
>> + struct lsm_info *info;
> Kees asked if this field should be const in response to your 01 May
> posting. Please address this.
>
> Also, I'd love to see more folk review & ack these patches.
Unless there is serious interest in loadable security
module support there isn't a lot of value to be gained
with this patch set. I am officially agnostic on the topic.
I know that there has been significant resistance to the
facility in the past. I will put more effort into review
if [un]loadable modules have a future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list