[PATCH] tpm: separate cmd_ready/go_idle from runtime_pm
Winkler, Tomas
tomas.winkler at intel.com
Wed May 23 13:48:17 UTC 2018
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:27:46AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:46:00PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > New wrappers are added tpm_cmd_ready() and tpm_go_idle()
> wrappers
> > > > to streamline tpm_try_transmit code. TPM_TRANSMIT_UNLOCKED flag
> is
> > > abused
> > > > to resolve tpm spaces recursive calls to tpm_transmit().
> > >
> > > This looks good and all but I don't think we want to abuse anything
> > > in the driver code, do we?
> >
> > It's not abuse just the flag UNLOCKED is not really named correctly I
> > think this has to be backported so wanted to do less invasive change.
>
> It should be renamed anyway and possible merge conflicts are not hard to
> sort out in this change. Can you rename it as SPACE?
Not sure, I believe UNLOCKED is still better name than SPACE, I'm not sure this is
Do you also want to remove TPM_TRANSMIT_RAW?
clk_enable is handling its own anti recursion counter 'data->clkrun_enabled'
but it should be all handled under one flag I guess.
> Right, and even without rename this will probably cause merge conflicts at
> least in v4.4 an v4.9 since in-kernel RM landed in v4.12, so not much gain not
> do the rename :-)
I belive we should do minimal change and the big cleanup after that.
Not sure, I believe UNLOCKED is still better name than SPACE even it wasn't the original intention.
No the SPACE is the issue, but any recursion call into tpm_transmit. A bigger change is needed
and rename to SPACE would be just another intermediat change.
Please reconsider.
Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list