[PATCH v3 3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf
jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com
Mon Mar 19 14:42:05 UTC 2018
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:36:52AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 14:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:52:24PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > Hi Jarrko,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> > > > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM. I'm seeing the
> > > following line in dmesg.
> > >
> > > [ 1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256
> > Thank you for reporting this Mimi. Does it have TPM1/TPM2?
> The pi has a TPM 2.0 attached to the GPIO. James pointed out the
> change in return codes.
> + if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
> chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> - return 0;
> + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
> + return rc;
Oops, thank you James and Mimi for pointing this out. I'll refine
the patch set.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive