[PATCH v3 1/6] tpm-buf: create new functions for handling TPM buffers
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 16 12:02:26 UTC 2018
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 13:58 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 14:14 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > TPM_BUF_OVERFLOW = BIT(0),
> > + TPM_BUF_2B = BIT(1),
>
> Instead of re-using this I would prefer to have another enum for
> buffer type. tpm_buf_init() could have the signature:
>
> int tpm_buf_init(unsigned int type);
>
> For commands there should be a function:
>
> void tpm_buf_set_command_header(struct tpm_buf *buf, u16 tag, u32 ordinal);
>
> And tpm_buf_append_2b() should not exist at all. It should be
> maintained automatically by other append commands.
Can you send the next version this patch as a separate entity? Once
I can land this we have kind of stable ground for the following
patches. After that it is easier test and review them.
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list