[PATCH 4/7] Protectable Memory

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:06:17PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> struct gen_pool *pmalloc_create_pool(const char *name,
> 					 int min_alloc_order);
> int is_pmalloc_object(const void *ptr, const unsigned long n);
> bool pmalloc_prealloc(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t size);
> void *pmalloc(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp);
> static inline void *pzalloc(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> static inline void *pmalloc_array(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t n,
> 				  size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> static inline void *pcalloc(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t n,
> 			    size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> static inline char *pstrdup(struct gen_pool *pool, const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
> int pmalloc_protect_pool(struct gen_pool *pool);
> static inline void pfree(struct gen_pool *pool, const void *addr)
> int pmalloc_destroy_pool(struct gen_pool *pool);

Do you have users for all these functions?  I'm particularly sceptical of
pfree().  To my mind, a user wants to:

pmalloc_create();
pmalloc(); * N
pmalloc_protect();
...
pmalloc_destroy();

I don't mind the pstrdup, pcalloc, pmalloc_array, pzalloc variations, but
I don't know why you need is_pmalloc_object().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html