[PATCH v7] tpm: separate cmd_ready/go_idle from runtime_pm
Winkler, Tomas
tomas.winkler at intel.com
Wed Jun 27 21:13:40 UTC 2018
> On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 21:15 +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > Right now if I really put head into this I can understand the logic
> > > but it is a complete mess.
> >
> > I think what is the mess is that we have a recursive call to
> > tpm_transmit topped with retries. All other mess is just the result of that.
> >
> > > I will forgot the dependencies between flags within few weeks.
> >
> > Hope the reasons are well documented both in code and the commit
> > message, if not let's address that. We really cannot depend on one's
> memory.
> > It's not like I'm not striving for simplest possible code.
> >
> > > A fixed requirement (so that you know) is that they must be
> > > independent.
> >
> > The flags (hope this what you referring here to) are not independent
> > and weren't before, (RAW cannot be called alone as you will have
> > double locking) putting them under one name just should make it clear.
> > I beg you to go over the code one more time, don't get stuck with
> > flags names, maybe you even discover some real issue.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Tomas
>
> You should then find a solution where you can remove
> TPM_TRANSMIT_RAW completely and make it as a separate commit, not
> part of the bug fix.
> This is not in a shape that I would dare to put this in a pull request.
Very well, I will remove the NESTED flag. though I have feeling you are shooting from the hip you didn't really read the code.
Please there anyone who can review the code?
Tomas
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þǺ¸Ëù¨vé^þ)í
æèw*jg¬±¨¶Ý¢jÿ¾«þG«éÿ¢¸¢·¦j:+v¨wèjØm¶ÿþø¯ù®w¥þàþf£¢·hâúÿÙ¥
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list