[-next PATCH] security: use octal not symbolic permissions
Paul Moore
paul at paul-moore.com
Tue Jun 12 21:12:23 UTC 2018
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:32 PM, James Morris <jmorris at namei.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>> If you want to break this up by security module I would take
>> the Smack part as soon as James does the tree update. If James
>> wants to take the whole thing at once you can add my:
>>
>> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
>>
>> for the Smack changes.
>
> It's probably simplest for me to take them as one patch.
I would prefer if the SELinux changes were split into a separate
patch. I'm guessing John would probably want the same for the
AppArmor patches, but take his work for it, not mine.
Joe, in general I really appreciate the fixes you send, but these
patches that cross a lot of subsystem boundaries (this isn't the first
one that does this) causes unnecessary conflicts in -next and during
the merge window. Could you split your patches up from now on please?
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list