[PATCH] tpm: add support for partial reads
Tadeusz Struk
tadeusz.struk at intel.com
Thu Jul 19 21:01:16 UTC 2018
On 07/19/2018 01:27 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 13:12 -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
>> On 07/19/2018 12:52 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> The ABI break is the error case as I outlined above. We can't
>>> assume everyone uses the current interface without getting an error
>>> and one error and your hosed is a nasty failure case to change the
>>> interface to.
>>
>> Well, if there is a broken application out there that doesn't work
>> today it will not work after this change neither.
>
> It doesn't have to be broken ... it could be using EFAULT to probe the
> buffer size for instance. That's the point of not breaking the ABI:
> you don't second guess what applications are doing.
>
Looking at the existing implementation again:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c?h=next-tpm#n56
EFAULT is returned only if the copy_to_user() fails.
So today, if an application wants read 1 byte of a response, and provides
1 byte buffer for it, then only 1 byte of the response will be copied,
no error code will be returned, and the rest of the response will be gone.
I don't really see how and why would anyone use EFAULT err to probe for
the buffer size. That would really be a broken application.
Thanks,
--
Tadeusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list