[PATCH 2/7] genalloc: selftest
Igor Stoppa
igor.stoppa at huawei.com
Mon Feb 26 18:00:26 UTC 2018
On 26/02/18 19:46, J Freyensee wrote:
>
>
> On 2/26/18 4:11 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
>>
>> On 24/02/18 00:42, J Freyensee wrote:
>>>> + locations[action->location] = gen_pool_alloc(pool, action->size);
>>>> + BUG_ON(!locations[action->location]);
>>> Again, I'd think it through if you really want to use BUG_ON() or not:
>>>
>>> https://lwn.net/Articles/13183/
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/4/1
>> Is it acceptable to display only a WARNing, in case of risking damaging
>> a mounted filesystem?
>
> That's a good question. Based upon those articles, 'yes'. But it seems
> like a 'darned-if-you-do, darned-if-you-don't' question as couldn't you
> also corrupt a mounted filesystem by crashing the kernel, yes/no?
The idea is to do it very early in the boot phase, before early init,
when the kernel has not gotten even close to any storage device.
> If you really want a system crash, maybe just do a panic() like
> filesystems also use?
ok, if that's a more acceptable way to halt the kernel, I do not mind.
--
igor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list