[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Thu Dec 13 11:04:20 UTC 2018
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 19:02 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 09:17:07AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > The goal of this patch series is to control script interpretation. A
> > new O_MAYEXEC flag used by sys_open() is added to enable userland script
> > interpreter to delegate to the kernel (and thus the system security
> > policy) the permission to interpret scripts or other files containing
> > what can be seen as commands.
> I don't have a problem with the concept, but we're running low on O_ bits.
> Does this have to be done before the process gets a file descriptor,
> or could we have a new syscall? Since we're going to be changing the
> interpreters anyway, it doesn't seem like too much of an imposition to
> ask them to use:
> int verify_for_exec(int fd)
> instead of adding an O_MAYEXEC.
The indication needs to be set during file open, before the open
returns to the caller. This is the point where ima_file_check()
verifies the file's signature. On failure, access to the file is
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive