[PATCH 1/3] big key: get rid of stack array allocation
Serge E. Hallyn
serge at hallyn.com
Tue Apr 24 19:58:45 UTC 2018
Quoting Tycho Andersen (tycho at tycho.ws):
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:46:38PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > > > + if (unlikely(crypto_aead_ivsize(big_key_aead) != GCM_AES_IV_SIZE)) {
> > > > > + WARN(1, "big key algorithm changed?");
> >
> > Please avoid using WARN() WARN_ON() etc.
> > syzbot would catch it and panic() due to panic_on_warn == 1.
>
> But it is really a programming bug in this case (and it seems better
> than BUG()...). Isn't this exactly the sort of case we want to catch?
>
> Tycho
Right - is there a url to some discussion about this? Because not
using WARN when WARN should be used, because it troubles a bot, seems
the wrong solution. If this *is* what's been agreed upon, then
what is the new recommended thing to do here?
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list