[PATCH v5 1/1] security: Add mechanism to safely (un)load LSMs after boot time
penguin-kernel at i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Mon Apr 9 05:25:01 UTC 2018
Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > Remove SECURITY_HOOK_COUNT and "struct security_hook_list"->owner and
> > the exception in randomize_layout_plugin.c because preventing module
> > unloading won't work as expected.
> Rather than completely removing the unloading code, might it make
> sense to add a BUG_ON or WARN_ON, in security_delete_hooks if
> allow_unload_module is false, and owner is not NULL?
Do we need to check ->owner != NULL? Although it will be true that
SELinux's ->owner == NULL and LKM-based LSM module's ->owner != NULL,
I think we unregister SELinux before setting allow_unload_module to false.
Thus, rejecting delete_security_hooks() if allow_unload_module == false will
be sufficient. SELinux might want to call panic() if delete_security_hooks()
did not unregister due to allow_unload_module == false. Also,
allow_unload_module would be renamed to allow_unregister_module.
By the way, please don't use BUG_ON() or WARN_ON() because syzbot would hit
and call panic() because syzbot runs tests with panic_on_warn == true.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive