[PATCH] apparmor: Fix harmless off by one in map_signal_num()

John Johansen john.johansen at canonical.com
Mon Sep 25 14:25:01 UTC 2017


On 09/01/2017 04:52 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This patch has no effect on runtime.
> 
> The sig_map[] array has MAXMAPPED_SIG (35) members so my static checker
> complains that the <= should be <.  But in this case it's not possible
> for "sig" to be more than 31 because of the "else if (sig >= SIGRTMIN)"
> condition since SIGRTMIN is 32.  The last three elements, 32-34, of
> sig_map[] are empty so this code works as designed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/ipc.c b/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> index 66fb9ede9447..5091c78062e4 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int map_signal_num(int sig)
>  		return SIGUNKNOWN;
>  	else if (sig >= SIGRTMIN)
>  		return sig - SIGRTMIN + 128;	/* rt sigs mapped to 128 */
> -	else if (sig <= MAXMAPPED_SIG)
> +	else if (sig < MAXMAPPED_SIG)
>  		return sig_map[sig];
>  	return SIGUNKNOWN;
>  }
> 

Colin King beat you to this one, its in apparmor-next
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list