[PATCH] apparmor: Fix harmless off by one in map_signal_num()
John Johansen
john.johansen at canonical.com
Mon Sep 25 14:25:01 UTC 2017
On 09/01/2017 04:52 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This patch has no effect on runtime.
>
> The sig_map[] array has MAXMAPPED_SIG (35) members so my static checker
> complains that the <= should be <. But in this case it's not possible
> for "sig" to be more than 31 because of the "else if (sig >= SIGRTMIN)"
> condition since SIGRTMIN is 32. The last three elements, 32-34, of
> sig_map[] are empty so this code works as designed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/ipc.c b/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> index 66fb9ede9447..5091c78062e4 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int map_signal_num(int sig)
> return SIGUNKNOWN;
> else if (sig >= SIGRTMIN)
> return sig - SIGRTMIN + 128; /* rt sigs mapped to 128 */
> - else if (sig <= MAXMAPPED_SIG)
> + else if (sig < MAXMAPPED_SIG)
> return sig_map[sig];
> return SIGUNKNOWN;
> }
>
Colin King beat you to this one, its in apparmor-next
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list