[GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14
paul at paul-moore.com
Fri Sep 8 17:36:29 UTC 2017
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org> wrote:
>> But yes, for the init-time integrity_read_file this is incorrect.
>> It never tripped up, and I explicitly added the lockdep annotations
>> so that anything would show up, and it's been half a year since
>> I sent that first RFC patch..
> I don't think anybody actually tests linux-next kernels in any big
> way, and the automated tests that do get run probably don't run with
> any integrity checking enabled.
> Which is why I actually look at the code when merging unexpected stuff.
> This is also why I tend to prefer getting multiple branches for
> independent things.
> Now the whole security pull will be ignored because of this thing. I
> refuse to pull garbage where I notice major fundamental problems in
> code that has obviously never ever been tested.
Is it time to start sending pull request for each LSM and thing under
security/ directly? I'm not sure I have a strong preference either
way, I just don't want to see the SELinux changes ignored during the
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive