[PATCH V4 01/10] capabilities: factor out cap_bprm_set_creds privileged root
Kees Cook
keescook at chromium.org
Thu Sep 7 19:42:11 UTC 2017
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com> wrote:
> Factor out the case of privileged root from the function
> cap_bprm_set_creds() to make the latter easier to read and analyse.
>
> Suggested-by: Serge Hallyn <serge at hallyn.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge at hallyn.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
Note below...
> ---
> security/commoncap.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index d8e26fb..927fe93 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -472,6 +472,39 @@ static int get_file_caps(struct linux_binprm *bprm, bool *effective, bool *has_c
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static void handle_privileged_root(struct linux_binprm *bprm, bool has_cap,
> + bool *effective, kuid_t root_uid)
If you do a v5 of this, I think it'd be nice to add a comment here
describing what is being checked and the side-effects (i.e.
cap_permitted changes, when effective is set, etc).
-Kees
> +{
> + const struct cred *old = current_cred();
> + struct cred *new = bprm->cred;
> +
> + if (issecure(SECURE_NOROOT))
> + return;
> + /*
> + * If the legacy file capability is set, then don't set privs
> + * for a setuid root binary run by a non-root user. Do set it
> + * for a root user just to cause least surprise to an admin.
> + */
> + if (has_cap && !uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid) && uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid)) {
> + warn_setuid_and_fcaps_mixed(bprm->filename);
> + return;
> + }
> + /*
> + * To support inheritance of root-permissions and suid-root
> + * executables under compatibility mode, we override the
> + * capability sets for the file.
> + *
> + * If only the real uid is 0, we do not set the effective bit.
> + */
> + if (uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid) || uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid)) {
> + /* pP' = (cap_bset & ~0) | (pI & ~0) */
> + new->cap_permitted = cap_combine(old->cap_bset,
> + old->cap_inheritable);
> + }
> + if (uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid))
> + *effective = true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cap_bprm_set_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
> * @bprm: The execution parameters, including the proposed creds
> @@ -484,46 +517,20 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> {
> const struct cred *old = current_cred();
> struct cred *new = bprm->cred;
> - bool effective, has_cap = false, is_setid;
> + bool effective = false, has_cap = false, is_setid;
> int ret;
> kuid_t root_uid;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!cap_ambient_invariant_ok(old)))
> return -EPERM;
>
> - effective = false;
> ret = get_file_caps(bprm, &effective, &has_cap);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> root_uid = make_kuid(new->user_ns, 0);
>
> - if (!issecure(SECURE_NOROOT)) {
> - /*
> - * If the legacy file capability is set, then don't set privs
> - * for a setuid root binary run by a non-root user. Do set it
> - * for a root user just to cause least surprise to an admin.
> - */
> - if (has_cap && !uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid) && uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid)) {
> - warn_setuid_and_fcaps_mixed(bprm->filename);
> - goto skip;
> - }
> - /*
> - * To support inheritance of root-permissions and suid-root
> - * executables under compatibility mode, we override the
> - * capability sets for the file.
> - *
> - * If only the real uid is 0, we do not set the effective bit.
> - */
> - if (uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid) || uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid)) {
> - /* pP' = (cap_bset & ~0) | (pI & ~0) */
> - new->cap_permitted = cap_combine(old->cap_bset,
> - old->cap_inheritable);
> - }
> - if (uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid))
> - effective = true;
> - }
> -skip:
> + handle_privileged_root(bprm, has_cap, &effective, root_uid);
>
> /* if we have fs caps, clear dangerous personality flags */
> if (!cap_issubset(new->cap_permitted, old->cap_permitted))
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list