[tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: remove chip_num parameter from in-kernel API
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
prasannatsmkumar at gmail.com
Thu Oct 26 16:23:30 UTC 2017
On 26 October 2017 at 00:41, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:21:16PM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
>> >> > 2. Moving struct tpm_rng to the TPM client is architecturally
>> >> > uacceptable.
>> >>
>> >> As there was no response to the patch there is no way to know whether
>> >> it is acceptable or not.
>> >
>> > I like the idea of removing the tpm rng driver as discussed in other
>> > emails in this thread.
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> No, thank you.
>
> I didn't first understand the big idea and only looked at the code
> change per se. I apologize for that.
No need for that. I missed mentioning the reason for the patch and it
is not obvious from code change. Its my fault.
> The problem that you went to solve was real and it led to a properly
> implemented solution. You were not late from the party. Jason's code
> change is derivative work of your code change. That's why his code
> change has also your signed-off-by.
>
> Thanks for doing awesome work :-)
Its really nice to hear such words :-) :-D.
>
> /Jarkko
Thanks and regards,
PrasannaKumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list