[PATCH] selinux: Perform both commoncap and selinux xattr checks
Serge E. Hallyn
serge at hallyn.com
Mon Oct 2 15:52:37 UTC 2017
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm at xmission.com):
> -UID: 28009
> Status: O
>
>
> When selinux is loaded the relax permission checks for writing
> security.capable are not honored. Which keeps file capabilities
> from being used in user namespaces.
>
> Stephen Smalley <sds at tycho.nsa.gov> writes:
> > Originally SELinux called the cap functions directly since there was no
> > stacking support in the infrastructure and one had to manually stack a
> > secondary module internally. inode_setxattr and inode_removexattr
> > however were special cases because the cap functions would check
> > CAP_SYS_ADMIN for any non-capability attributes in the security.*
> > namespace, and we don't want to impose that requirement on setting
> > security.selinux. Thus, we inlined the capabilities logic into the
> > selinux hook functions and adapted it appropriately.
>
> Now that the permission checks in commoncap have evolved this
> inlining of their contents has become a problem. So restructure
> selinux_inode_removexattr, and selinux_inode_setxattr to call
> both the corresponding cap_inode_ function and dentry_has_perm
> when the attribute is not a selinux security xattr. This ensures
> the policies of both commoncap and selinux are enforced.
>
> This results in smack and selinux having the same basic structure
> for setxattr and removexattr. Performing their own special permission
> checks when it is their modules xattr being written to, and deferring
> to commoncap when that is not the case. Then finally performing their
> generic module policy on all xattr writes.
>
> This structure is fine when you only consider stacking with the
> commoncap lsm, but it becomes a problem if two lsms that don't want
> the commoncap security checks on their own attributes need to be
> stack. This means there will need to be updates in the future as lsm
> stacking is improved, but at least now the structure between smack and
> selinux is common making the code easier to refactor.
>
> This change also has the effect that selinux_linux_setotherxattr becomes
> unnecessary so it is removed.
>
> Fixes: 8db6c34f1dbc ("Introduce v3 namespaced file capabilities")
> Fixes: 7bbf0e052b76 ("[PATCH] selinux merge")
> Historical Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm at xmission.com>
This is hairy, but it looks right:
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge at hallyn.com>
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list