[PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap()
Serge E. Hallyn
serge at hallyn.com
Wed Nov 29 17:28:52 UTC 2017
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (tytso at mit.edu):
> Half the problem here is that with containers, people are changing the
> security model, because they want to let untrusted users have "root",
> without really having "root". Part of the fundamental problem is that
> there are some well-meaning, but fundamentally misguided people, who
> have been asserting: "Containers are just as secure as VM's".
>
> Well, they are not. And the sooner people get past this, the better
> off they'll be....
Just to be clear, module loading requires - and must always continue to
require - CAP_SYS_MODULE against the initial user namespace. Containers
in user namespaces do not have that.
I don't believe anyone has ever claimed that containers which are not in
a user namespace are in any way secure.
(And as for the other claim, I'd prefer to stick to "VMs are in most
cases as insecure as properly configured containers" :)
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list