[PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap()
Luis R. Rodriguez
mcgrof at kernel.org
Tue Nov 28 22:12:37 UTC 2017
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:39:58PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof at kernel.org> wrote:
> > And *all* auto-loading uses aliases? What's the difference between auto-loading
> > and direct-loading?
>
> The difference is the process privileges. Unprivilged autoloading
> (e.g. int n_hdlc = N_HDLC; ioctl(fd,
> TIOCSETD, &n_hdlc)), triggers a privileged call to finit_module()
> under CAP_SYS_MODULE.
Ah, so system call implicated request_module() calls.
> >> We already have a global sysctl for blocking direct-loading (modules_disabled).
> >
> > My point was that even if you have a CAP_NET_ADMIN check on request_module(),
> > finit_module() will not check for it, so a crafty userspace could still try
> > to just finit_module() directly, and completely then bypass the CAP_NET_ADMIN
> > check.
>
> You need CAP_SYS_MODULE to run finit_module().
OK and since CAP_SYS_MODULE is much more restrictive one could argue, what's the
point here?
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list