[kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v5 next 5/5] net: modules: use request_module_cap() to load 'netdev-%s' modules
Kees Cook
keescook at chromium.org
Tue Nov 28 20:20:32 UTC 2017
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> Linus, are you okay with this series if the global sysctl gets dropped?
>
> So really, it's not the "global sysctl" as much as the "global
> request_module()" that annoys me.
>
> I'll happily take the request_module_cap() part and the thing that
> makes networking use that.
>
> But the flag that we have to default to off because it breaks every
> single box otherwise? No. It doesn't matter if it's one single global
> or just a "global behavior for request_module() for this process" at
> that point, it's still a pointless security flag that is opt-in.
To be clear: such a flag wouldn't doesn't break every system, but I
understand your concern.
So what's the right path forward for allowing a way to block
autoloading? Separate existing request_module() calls into "must be
privileged" and "can be unpriv" first, then rework the series to deal
with the "unpriv okay" subset?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list