[RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode

[James Morris]

On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> Thank you for the clarification (and patience).  There are a lot of
> interactions between the integrity subsystem and the other security
> subsystems, especially the TPM.  Assuming it is acceptable, as you
> said, I'd really prefer continuing to have the integrity subsystem
> merged via the security tree.

That's fine, whatever works for you.


-- 
James Morris
<james.l.morris at oracle.com>