[PATCH 03/27] Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked down
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Nov 2 21:41:21 UTC 2017
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 21:30 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > By this point, IMA-appraisal has already verified the kernel module
> > signature back in kernel_read_file_from_fd(), if it was required.
> > Having a key with which to verify the appended signature or requiring
> > an appended signature, should not be required as well.
>
> I guess I don't need to put in any support for IMA here, then, and you've
> taken care of it in your patchset such that it won't actually go into
> module_sig_check() in that case (or will at least return immediately).
Right, it would never get here if the IMA signature verification
fails. If sig_enforce is not enabled, then it will also work. So the
only case is if sig_enforced is enabled and there is no key.
eg.
else if (can_do_ima_check && is_ima_appraise_enabled())
err = 0;
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list