[PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head
James Morris
jmorris at namei.org
Wed May 31 22:56:18 UTC 2017
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> On 30/05/17 13:32, James Morris wrote:
>
> > This seems like pointless churn in security-critical code in anticipation
> > of features which are still in development and may not be adopted.
> >
> > Is there a compelling reason to merge this now? (And I don't mean worrying
> > about non-existent compliers).
>
> I propose to take this patch as part of those I will be submitting.
> It took me some unplanned time to add support for hardened user copy,
> but now it's done - at least to a point that I can test it without failures.
>
> So I'm back on track to provide an example of the smalloc api and I can
> also use Tetsuo's work (thanks again, btw).
> This patch would be sandwiched between the smalloc ones and the LSM rework.
>
> It can get merged when the rest (hopefully) is merged.
>
> But I have a more prosaic question: since smalloc is affecting the
> memory subsystem, can it still be merged through the security tree?
It needs acks from the maintainers of the affected subsystems.
--
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list