[kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] security: tty: make TIOCSTI ioctl require CAP_SYS_ADMIN
James Morris
jmorris at namei.org
Wed May 31 02:48:50 UTC 2017
On Mon, 29 May 2017, Boris Lukashev wrote:
> With all due respect sir, i believe your review falls short of the
> purpose of this effort - to harden the kernel against flaws in
> userspace.
Which effort? Kernel self protection is about protecting against flaws in
the kernel.
See:
https://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Kernel_Self_Protection_Project
"This project starts with the premise that kernel bugs have a very long
lifetime, and that the kernel must be designed in ways to protect against
these flaws."
We need to avoid conflating:
- hardening the kernel against attack; and
- modifying the kernel to try and harden userspace.
These patches are the latter, and the case for them is not as
straightforward.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list