[PATCH] tpm: fix byte order related arithmetic inconsistency in tpm_getcap()
Luc Van Oostenryck
luc.vanoostenryck at gmail.com
Wed May 10 23:41:15 UTC 2017
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Arithmetic should work but it's not a good practice to do additions,
> substractions or multiplications in any other byte order than the CPU
> byte order.
>
> sparse also complains about this.
>
> /Jarkko
Arithmetic should work?
let's try with 0x0080:
in native order: 0x0080 + 0x0080 = 0x0100
in reverse order: 0x8000 + 0x8000 = 0x0000 != swap16(0x0100)
Or do I misunderstand what you mean by "arithmetic should work"?
-- Luc Van Oostenryck
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list