[tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] tpm: infrastructure for TPM spaces
Ken Goldman
kgoldman at us.ibm.com
Wed Mar 22 20:09:21 UTC 2017
On 2/22/2017 12:39 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> Right at the moment the kernel use of tpm2 looks like
>
> acquire chip->tpm_mutex
> load key
> process key
> unload key
> release chip->tpm_mutex
>
> While it does this, there's no need for it to have a RM interface
> because what it does between the acquisition and drop of the mutex
> can't be seen by or have any effect on userspace (whether it uses the
> RM or not). So currently, the question doesn't arise, which is the
> situation you see.
1 - This appears to depend on the RM not releasing the mutex until all
objects are swapped out. Correct? Same for sessions?
2 - A startauthsession can cause a regap error. Does the above depend
on the RM doing early regapping so the RM won't see that error?
3 - There's also the problem where the TPM saved session slots
(typically 64) are full. My intuition is that the best solution is for
the RM to reserve 3 slots for the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list