[PATCH v2] Moved module init-functions into the module.
Steve Kemp
steve at steve.fi
Thu Jun 22 17:21:24 UTC 2017
> > The module initialization code belongs in the module.
> > The LSM infrastructure should have an absolute minimum
> > of module specific information. I would rather see the
> > "minor" modules (yama, loadpin) changed to use the module
> > registration scheme used by the "major" modules, but that
> > will require a mechanism to ensure module ordering, and
> > we don't have that yet. No, don't do this.
>
> Yeah, I agree: initialization order is important here and I don't want
> to depend on the Makefile for this.
I can appreciate that argument. I did consider it myself,
but decided that because the minor modules had such differing
goals, and no real functional overlap, in practice that would
mean that explicit ordering wasn't a strong requirement.
If/when a better registration scheme becomes available then
we'll all switch to using it, and that would be great.
Thanks for the feedback. I'll not tweak any further.
Steve
--
https://steve.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Linux-security-module-archive
mailing list