[PATCH v4 04/15] apparmor: Refactor to remove bprm_secureexec hook

[Kees Cook]

The AppArmor bprm_secureexec hook can be merged with the bprm_set_creds
hook since it's dealing with the same information, and all of the details
are finalized during the first call to the bprm_set_creds hook via
prepare_binprm() (subsequent calls due to binfmt_script, etc, are ignored
via bprm->called_set_creds).

Here, all the comments describe how secureexec is actually calculated
during bprm_set_creds, so this actually does it, drops the bprm flag that
was being used internally by AppArmor, and drops the bprm_secureexec hook.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris at oracle.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge at hallyn.com>
---
 security/apparmor/domain.c         | 22 +---------------------
 security/apparmor/include/domain.h |  1 -
 security/apparmor/include/file.h   |  3 ---
 security/apparmor/lsm.c            |  1 -
 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 878407e023e3..1a1b1ec89d9d 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -485,14 +485,11 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	 *
 	 * Cases 2 and 3 are marked as requiring secure exec
 	 * (unless policy specified "unsafe exec")
-	 *
-	 * bprm->unsafe is used to cache the AA_X_UNSAFE permission
-	 * to avoid having to recompute in secureexec
 	 */
 	if (!(perms.xindex & AA_X_UNSAFE)) {
 		AA_DEBUG("scrubbing environment variables for %s profile=%s\n",
 			 name, new_profile->base.hname);
-		bprm->unsafe |= AA_SECURE_X_NEEDED;
+		bprm->secureexec = 1;
 	}
 apply:
 	/* when transitioning profiles clear unsafe personality bits */
@@ -521,23 +518,6 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 }
 
 /**
- * apparmor_bprm_secureexec - determine if secureexec is needed
- * @bprm: binprm for exec  (NOT NULL)
- *
- * Returns: %1 if secureexec is needed else %0
- */
-int apparmor_bprm_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
-{
-	/* the decision to use secure exec is computed in set_creds
-	 * and stored in bprm->unsafe.
-	 */
-	if (bprm->unsafe & AA_SECURE_X_NEEDED)
-		return 1;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/**
  * apparmor_bprm_committing_creds - do task cleanup on committing new creds
  * @bprm: binprm for the exec  (NOT NULL)
  */
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/domain.h b/security/apparmor/include/domain.h
index 30544729878a..2495af293587 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/domain.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/domain.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ struct aa_domain {
 };
 
 int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
-int apparmor_bprm_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
 void apparmor_bprm_committing_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
 void apparmor_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
 
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/file.h b/security/apparmor/include/file.h
index 38f821bf49b6..076ac4501d97 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/file.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/file.h
@@ -66,9 +66,6 @@ struct path;
 #define AA_X_INHERIT		0x4000
 #define AA_X_UNCONFINED		0x8000
 
-/* AA_SECURE_X_NEEDED - is passed in the bprm->unsafe field */
-#define AA_SECURE_X_NEEDED	0x8000
-
 /* need to make conditional which ones are being set */
 struct path_cond {
 	kuid_t uid;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index 8f3c0f7aca5a..291c7126350f 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -624,7 +624,6 @@ static struct security_hook_list apparmor_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_set_creds, apparmor_bprm_set_creds),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_committing_creds, apparmor_bprm_committing_creds),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_committed_creds, apparmor_bprm_committed_creds),
-	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_secureexec, apparmor_bprm_secureexec),
 
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_setrlimit, apparmor_task_setrlimit),
 };
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html