[Linux-ima-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/4] ima: define new ima_sb_post_new_mount hook

James Morris jmorris at namei.org
Thu Aug 17 02:39:00 UTC 2017


On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> In this context, I'm not sure what you mean by "loaded".  IMA needs to
> be enabled from the very beginning to capture all measurements and
> verify the integrity of files, without any gaps.  At some point this
> would include other LSM policies.

I think it's better to keep IMA orthogonal to LSM for this reason.

The original motivation to implement IMA as a separate API was because LSM 
was at the time considered specific to access control mechanisms, although 
that is not the case now.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>


More information about the Linux-security-module-archive mailing list